What was the primary concern that drove the need for a stronger governing document than the Articles of Confederation?

The primary concern that led to the necessity for a stronger governing document than the Articles of Confederation stems from multiple interrelated issues, including economic stability, national security, and effective governance.

The Articles, which established a loose confederation of states, resulted in a weak central government that struggled to handle these critical areas effectively. Economically, the lack of a strong federal authority meant that the national government could not impose taxes or regulate commerce, leading to financial instability and disputes between states. This economic weakness underscored the need for a more robust governing structure capable of managing economic affairs.

In terms of national security, the inability of the central government to raise an army or adequately coordinate defense efforts left the nation vulnerable to external threats. States often acted independently, which hindered a unified response to security concerns. A stronger governing framework was necessary to provide cohesive national defense.

Effective governance was another significant concern. The Articles required unanimous consent for amendments, which was impractical and led to gridlock. The central government lacked the power to enforce laws or implement policies effectively, creating a governance crisis. The Founding Fathers recognized that a stronger federal system was essential to address these challenges and ensure a functioning and stable government.

This multifaceted concern is encapsulated in